Building Codes & Design
When legal professionals contact us about a building code or design-related matter, they are often trying to untangle if something went wrong in the construction or use of a structure—and whether that situation stems from code violations, design flaws, or construction defects. We understand that these cases can be technically dense and legally nuanced. That is why our team is built around deep expertise in architectural design, structural engineering, and code compliance, all delivered with clear communication and litigation-ready analysis.
One of the first things attorneys want to know is whether we are familiar with the specific codes involved—and yes, we are. Whether it is the International Building Code (IBC), local amendments, fire safety codes, ADA requirements, or historic preservation standards, our experts are well-versed in the regulatory frameworks that govern the built environment. We have worked on a wide range of cases, from structural collapses and water intrusion to accessibility disputes and unsafe occupancy issues, helping legal teams determine where liability lies and how to support or defend a claim.
We take a meticulous, evidence-based approach to every investigation. That means conducting detailed site inspections, reviewing architectural and engineering plans, analyzing construction documents, and comparing them against the applicable codes at the time of design and construction. We document the evidence using measurements, photos, and expert interpretations that can withstand courtroom scrutiny.
What truly sets us apart is our ability to translate technical findings into clear, compelling narratives. We know judges and juries are not engineers or architects, so we focus on explaining the "what" and "why" in plain terms—without sacrificing accuracy or authority. Our reports are clear, our testimony is confident, and our opinions are backed by years of real-world design and code compliance experience. When legal professionals work with us, they get more than expert analysis—they gain a partner who helps them build their case from the ground up.
A forensic architect provides an expert investigation of defects in the built environment, researches relevant building codes, building design and construction standards, and building design and construction contracts for matters in litigation.
Forensic architecture helps in legal cases by reconstructing and analyzing physical environments, to provide context. This can be used to support or challenge testimonies, verify events, or provide clarity in complex situations.
Forensic architecture is used in a wide range of cases, including environmental disasters, building collapses, slip, trip, and falls due to defective walking surfaces and defective construction. It is particularly useful in situations where physical evidence or witness testimonies need to be verified or clarified.
While traditional forensic science focuses on physical evidence, forensic architecture focuses on the spatial and environmental context of an incident. It uses architectural analysis, spatial relationships, and visual evidence to reconstruct events and provide a more comprehensive understanding of what happened.
Forensic architects often collaborate with other experts, including engineers and forensic scientists. They may work alongside teams of investigators to analyze physical evidence, interpret data, and present findings in a way that supports legal objectives.
Forensic analysis is more detailed and typically performed after a problem has occurred (e.g., structural failure), focusing on cause, liability, and often litigation.
- General contractors
- Subcontractors
- Architects and engineers
- Project managers or consultants
- Material suppliers
- Property owners or developers
Liability depends on contracts, negligence, code violations, or breach of duty.
- Structural failure or collapse
- Water intrusion or mold
- Code non-compliance
- Poor workmanship or material defects
- Delays and cost overruns
- Foundation and soil issues
- Safety or OSHA violations
- As-built drawings vs. design plans
- Inspection reports and punch lists
- Photographs, videos, drone footage
- Material test results
- Correspondence, emails, RFIs
- Building code references
Yes. Courts and arbitrators can apportion fault based on responsibility, contract terms, or contribution to the issue.
P.E. — President, Civil Engineer
Ronald J. Cohen, P.E., is a Civil Engineer with a Bachelor of Science degree and over forty years of engineering experience. Mr. Cohen joined the firm in 1994 and has served as its Vice President since 2003. Prior to joining Consulting Engineers & Scientists, Inc., Mr. Cohen was…
Civil Engineer
Harry J. Dales is a Civil Engineer with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and over 25 years of engineering experience. Mr. Dales has extensive experience in engineering and construction, including roadways, highways, parking lots, traffic controls…
AIA, NCARB — Vice President, Registered Architect
David M. Kenney, A.I.A., is a Registered Architect with a Bachelor of Architecture degree and over twenty-five years of architectural experience. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Kenney was founder and President of DM Kenney Architects with architectural and construction management…
